tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6083572548028483665.post3043852243605757352..comments2023-03-25T19:24:00.019-04:00Comments on The Economist's Cookbook: You're Going on the List...The_Chefhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05544443854634465201noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6083572548028483665.post-53163064485694528132010-03-16T17:21:34.645-04:002010-03-16T17:21:34.645-04:00Thanks WW,
I appreciate the visit, And while D...Thanks WW, <br /><br />I appreciate the visit, And while David and I see eye to eye on most things, many of his readers will disagree with me on others. <br /><br />I agree with your analysis and think that the idea of checking off legal boxes to say "okay we did X,Y,&Z therefore the outcome MUST be just.<br /><br />Too much faith in the system is the fundamental problem in that instance.The_Chefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05544443854634465201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6083572548028483665.post-79966426124237953452010-03-16T13:27:38.211-04:002010-03-16T13:27:38.211-04:00Visiting from David Codrea's War on Guns.
Rai...Visiting from David Codrea's War on Guns.<br /><br />Rainer was subjected to “reasonable regulations” and was “due processed”. The court said so. So, there. <br /><br />Folks who make regulations never make “unreasonable” regulations and the courts always allow for due process. Our jails and prisons are overflowing with otherwise not guilty inmates who have been due processed with reasonable regulations. The prosecutors get by with it because they say they can and the judges allow it because they say they can.<br /><br />[W-III]W W Woodwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13326046112820327760noreply@blogger.com